Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
11 to 3? That sounds about right for Hexagon. (well, unless 'remainder' students got split into fractions) We had 3 pupils on 1 machine, and it was basically a struggle to see who was Gilligan, who was Skipper, who was professor and how soon we would shipwreck our 'Minnow'...........
One more thing.
My best training has come from engineers, machinists and QA Directors challenging the CMM results my programs have produced. These type of challenges have helped me learn and gain a great deal of confidence in my abilities, the software, and the CMM's we use. I have also been proven wrong once or twice but I prefer not talking about that.
I concur for the most part but have encounter some pretty stupid engineers...I attended mechanical engineering at University of Missouri. ..Rolla...for 3 yrs prior to quiting to take a job to care for my wife and new baby...I intend on going back and finishING my last yr. ...my point...mechanical engineers have to learn statics...fluids. ...all sorts of physics. ..so, they of all people should understand XYZ <IJK><uvw>....I have worked with some that don't. ....why do I mention this? Well when checking profile my weapons of choice are thermal mapping and T-values....thinking that the engineer will appreciate this....NO!!! Doesn't understand. ..his direct words...WTF! SORRY...
11 to 3? That sounds about right for Hexagon. (well, unless 'remainder' students got split into fractions) We had 3 pupils on 1 machine, and it was basically a struggle to see who was Gilligan, who was Skipper, who was professor and how soon we would shipwreck our 'Minnow'...........
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |