I haven’t been able to validate a recent inquiry we received at my inspection lab, so I will post it here to play it safe. We were contacted by an individual who claims to work for Pfizer in quality control for a certain blue pill. He reached out to our lab to get an expert opinion on whether he should use least squares, max inscribed, or minimum circumscribed when taking before and after measurements of the circumference of his test subjects. He also asked what is the gentlest styli as he has been given feedback the the tungsten carbide is both too hard and too cold for their liking. Any thoughts?
On another note, does anyone know if there are specs for a proper circumcision? I’ve scoured medical literature but have yet to find any concrete tolerances on them. I’ve always thought mine looked suspicious. I’ve scanned my unit six ways from Sunday and have created a point cloud from the measurement data. If I can find out the nominal dimensions I can model up the perfect member and use the heat map style overlay to make my case to my physician, if my suspicions can be validated. Any info would be helpful.
I walked into the lab today.
I sat down at my computer.
I opened the PCDMIS Forum and noticed a new thread....
CMM/GD&T Jokes.
Hopeful, I opened it for a chuckle or two.
unfortunately the content was not there.
I spent a while thinking of a joke.
and yet I could not find it.
I had lost all hope.
I gazed outward from the lab.
through the window onto the shop floor.
and there it was.
the joke i had searched for.
it was faint
and unclear.
I had found the joke.
it was me.