hexagon logo

Odd Question

I have a new guy that just started and is telling me that, as of PC Dmis 2018, the software doesn't calculate round slot lengths, widths and locations correctly. So he measures all slots as square slots. 

I've been checking round slots for years with no issues and very good correlation between the CMM and hard gages. I would think, if there was an issue like this going back to 2018, it would have been addressed or something. 

Does any of this make sense to anyone or do I have a new guy making things up?

Parents
  • If the length of the round slot is long enough (judgement call here) then I always switch it to a square slot, for a couple reasons.  One being that it takes less hits to measure a square slot than a round one (if you do it right, anyway, 6 hits is NOT enough for a round slot, 3 at each end, while a square slot, width measurement, is 6 hits).  Two, when working with pierce sheet metal, the actual radius at each end can be slightly boinked, so by measuring it as a square slot, you get a better length result over round slot since the square slot (width measurement) measure the flat sides first, then takes hits at the mid-line of the sides on the ends of the radii.

  • I work with castings and solid pieces of steel or aluminum, very few sheet metal items. Normally, I do 4-6 hits on each end and 2-4 along the flats. A part was checked and all the slots reported as .005" below nominal. I knew that the CMM result was correct because the machinist told me he had a wrong tool and confirmed it with hard gages. This new guy was going to write off the .005" deviation as "machine error" because he claimed PC Dmis cannot calculate round slots correctly. I could see maybe .0005"-.001", but .005" seems a bit excessive.

    This guy is a younger programmer and is constantly criticizing older programs that our other programmer and myself wrote and have been using for years. At first, it was just we were not using the latest and greatest features. Now, he is telling us things like PC Dmis cannot calculate round slots or Keyin dimension can be used to insert text/comments in reports.

    I'm trying to figure out if he is full of it or there is something I was unaware of. It's been about 10 years since I've been through and formal CMM training.

Reply
  • I work with castings and solid pieces of steel or aluminum, very few sheet metal items. Normally, I do 4-6 hits on each end and 2-4 along the flats. A part was checked and all the slots reported as .005" below nominal. I knew that the CMM result was correct because the machinist told me he had a wrong tool and confirmed it with hard gages. This new guy was going to write off the .005" deviation as "machine error" because he claimed PC Dmis cannot calculate round slots correctly. I could see maybe .0005"-.001", but .005" seems a bit excessive.

    This guy is a younger programmer and is constantly criticizing older programs that our other programmer and myself wrote and have been using for years. At first, it was just we were not using the latest and greatest features. Now, he is telling us things like PC Dmis cannot calculate round slots or Keyin dimension can be used to insert text/comments in reports.

    I'm trying to figure out if he is full of it or there is something I was unaware of. It's been about 10 years since I've been through and formal CMM training.

Children