hexagon logo

PC-DMIS vs. NX for programming offline

Hey, all! I have been reading this forum a lot this year, and this is my first post. Thanks for all the help so far!!!

So far my shop has no offline programming capability, and I am trying to make a presentation to the boss to show a need for it and explore our options. At this point I am very comfortable programming with PC-DMIS (using v4.2) and would be very happy to upgrade to the latest version with an offline seat.

Our engineering department, however, uses Siemens NX, and they are pushing to use their software for creating CMM programs. From what I understand, the two big selling points are:

  1. a button which automatically generates an inspection program checking all selected features - which they claim will be 80% to 90% complete
  2. the ability to utilize Product Manufacturing Information (PMI) - i.e. datum definitions, tolerances, etc. - which are built into the model. This is supposed to save time with entering the information manually, but also offers revision control: when the model is revised, the inspection program is revised automatically.


My question for the forum: Has anybody had experience using NX software to write a program, or used programs written by NX? Is it as fast/easy/wonderful as they say it is? Do later versions of PC-DMIS support the use of PMI? Any input would be immensely helpful.
Parents
  • We spent a couple years looking into “Valisys”, the Unigraphics CMM programming extension. I am sure it has matured since then. But, it was expencive, buggy, slow, very complex and still ran though PCDMIS to control the CMM.

    We did NOT adopt the NX solution. I believe we are WAY ahead by doing online programming in PCDMIS. Measured and alignment targets are generated in NX 7.5. That works well. But, putting the probe path together, is best done in PCDMIS.

    Garry
Reply
  • We spent a couple years looking into “Valisys”, the Unigraphics CMM programming extension. I am sure it has matured since then. But, it was expencive, buggy, slow, very complex and still ran though PCDMIS to control the CMM.

    We did NOT adopt the NX solution. I believe we are WAY ahead by doing online programming in PCDMIS. Measured and alignment targets are generated in NX 7.5. That works well. But, putting the probe path together, is best done in PCDMIS.

    Garry
Children
No Data