Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
Ideally, yes. The tapped holes are drilled. The pin holes were milled (interpolated), but now he's spot drilling, drilling and using a reamer.
So the holes are or are not perpendicular? Report each ones' Perp and find out.
I'm using Xact. What boxes are you referring to?
"Use Current Alignment" ON or OFF, "Perp to Centerline" ON or OFF. Each check box being ON/OFF can produce different results.
I noticed those on the report. I'm not sure how to change this so they are all measured correctly. Sometimes it uses the start point and sometimes the end points. I think it always does Worst.
Change this in the code - hover over "Worst", click when it becomes active, and the other selections show up. For me part function or purpose of measurement determines which I select. I do use "Average" more frequently.
I checked the math of the deviations vs the TP dev. Most of the numbers match up. The ones that are off look to be a rounding difference.
When I used the height gauge to verify I was off by about .03 in one direction.
0.03mm is A LOT when the tolerance is only 0.08mm. Do the linear measurements make sense?
Yes (see below)
The circles are measured at the same nominal depths and then a cylinder is constructed. In a previous program for this part I used auto-cyl.
I'm not sure what this is referring to.. In the cyl edit window it shows Best fit and LEAST_SQR
Search HELP (Best Fit) to answer this question. The closer the Form of the cylinder gets to being perfectly round the less difference there will be between each algorithm.
Ideally, yes. The tapped holes are drilled. The pin holes were milled (interpolated), but now he's spot drilling, drilling and using a reamer.
So the holes are or are not perpendicular? Report each ones' Perp and find out.
I'm using Xact. What boxes are you referring to?
"Use Current Alignment" ON or OFF, "Perp to Centerline" ON or OFF. Each check box being ON/OFF can produce different results.
I noticed those on the report. I'm not sure how to change this so they are all measured correctly. Sometimes it uses the start point and sometimes the end points. I think it always does Worst.
Change this in the code - hover over "Worst", click when it becomes active, and the other selections show up. For me part function or purpose of measurement determines which I select. I do use "Average" more frequently.
I checked the math of the deviations vs the TP dev. Most of the numbers match up. The ones that are off look to be a rounding difference.
When I used the height gauge to verify I was off by about .03 in one direction.
0.03mm is A LOT when the tolerance is only 0.08mm. Do the linear measurements make sense?
Yes (see below)
The circles are measured at the same nominal depths and then a cylinder is constructed. In a previous program for this part I used auto-cyl.
I'm not sure what this is referring to.. In the cyl edit window it shows Best fit and LEAST_SQR
Search HELP (Best Fit) to answer this question. The closer the Form of the cylinder gets to being perfectly round the less difference there will be between each algorithm.
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |