I have experienced another bug: Creating a SCN of constructed points which are extracted hits from a circle.
I have 4 radii on a irregular shaped conical feature. I have a program where each hit from each circle is put into individual constructed points, put those points into a SCN and then measured the profile. In 2017 I get an crazy high number that is out of norm. However, this works in 2016 and lower (as this is a few year old program). So what I did to test this out, I created a scan from each circle's hit and measured that and I get what I expect. See code below:
SCN1 =FEAT/SET,CARTESIAN
THEO/<13.985,0,0>,<-1,0,0>
ACTL/<13.98,-0.02,-0.026>,<-1,0,0>
CONSTR/SET,BASIC,PNT5,PNT4,PNT3,PNT2,PNT1,PNT6,PNT7,PNT8,PNT9,PNT10,PNT22,PNT21,PNT20,PNT19,PNT18,PNT11,PNT14,PNT15,PNT16,PNT17,,
DIM 1= PROFILE OF SURFACE OF SET SCN1 FORMONLY VECTOR_LST_SQR UNITS=MM ,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 ARROWDENSITY=100 OUTPUT=BOTH
AX NOMINAL MEAS +TOL -TOL MAX MIN DEV OUTTOL
M 0.000 0.303 0.204 0.000 0.303 0.188 0.303 0.201 ---|--->
SCN2 =FEAT/SET,CARTESIAN
THEO/<13.985,0,0>,<-1,0,0>
ACTL/<13.98,-0.02,-0.026>,<-1,0,0>
CONSTR/SET,BASIC,CIR11.HIT[1..CIR11.NUMHITS],CIR12.HIT[1..CIR12.NUMHITS],CIR13.HIT[1..CIR13.NUMHITS],CIR14.HIT[1..CIR14.NUMHITS],,
DIM PROF1= PROFILE OF SURFACE OF SET SCN2 FORMONLY VECTOR_LST_SQR UNITS=MM ,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 ARROWDENSITY=100 OUTPUT=BOTH
AX NOMINAL MEAS +TOL -TOL MAX MIN DEV OUTTOL
M 0.000 0.061 0.204 0.000 0.025 -0.036 0.061 0.000 --#|#---
All the constructed points in SCN1 are the same as .HIT based points in SCN2.
I have experienced another bug: Creating a SCN of constructed points which are extracted hits from a circle.
I have 4 radii on a irregular shaped conical feature. I have a program where each hit from each circle is put into individual constructed points, put those points into a SCN and then measured the profile. In 2017 I get an crazy high number that is out of norm. However, this works in 2016 and lower (as this is a few year old program). So what I did to test this out, I created a scan from each circle's hit and measured that and I get what I expect. See code below:
SCN1 =FEAT/SET,CARTESIAN
THEO/<13.985,0,0>,<-1,0,0>
ACTL/<13.98,-0.02,-0.026>,<-1,0,0>
CONSTR/SET,BASIC,PNT5,PNT4,PNT3,PNT2,PNT1,PNT6,PNT7,PNT8,PNT9,PNT10,PNT22,PNT21,PNT20,PNT19,PNT18,PNT11,PNT14,PNT15,PNT16,PNT17,,
DIM 1= PROFILE OF SURFACE OF SET SCN1 FORMONLY VECTOR_LST_SQR UNITS=MM ,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 ARROWDENSITY=100 OUTPUT=BOTH
AX NOMINAL MEAS +TOL -TOL MAX MIN DEV OUTTOL
M 0.000 0.303 0.204 0.000 0.303 0.188 0.303 0.201 ---|--->
SCN2 =FEAT/SET,CARTESIAN
THEO/<13.985,0,0>,<-1,0,0>
ACTL/<13.98,-0.02,-0.026>,<-1,0,0>
CONSTR/SET,BASIC,CIR11.HIT[1..CIR11.NUMHITS],CIR12.HIT[1..CIR12.NUMHITS],CIR13.HIT[1..CIR13.NUMHITS],CIR14.HIT[1..CIR14.NUMHITS],,
DIM PROF1= PROFILE OF SURFACE OF SET SCN2 FORMONLY VECTOR_LST_SQR UNITS=MM ,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 ARROWDENSITY=100 OUTPUT=BOTH
AX NOMINAL MEAS +TOL -TOL MAX MIN DEV OUTTOL
M 0.000 0.061 0.204 0.000 0.025 -0.036 0.061 0.000 --#|#---
All the constructed points in SCN1 are the same as .HIT based points in SCN2.
