hexagon logo

Can I loop this?

Hi guys!

I'm on my last week before 4 weeks vacation and I feel great! Sunglasses

I've got this part that I'll be programming, and it's really something...
Not that complicated but it's large and it's got a whole bunch of small planes and edges inside, and the drawing states "Profile of any surface 0.8 ABC" (mm),
so I'll have to place points everywhere. It's kind of divided i two halves where the pattern is the same on the left vs right side. (Unfortunately I can't disclose the drawing document.)

So here's my question:
Can I use a loop to program left side, then move it to the right side and get all the points there too?

And would this work?


V1 = LOOP/START, ID = YES, NUMBER = 2, START =1, SKIP =,
OFFSET: XAXIS = 0, YAXIS = 208.82, ZAXIS = 0, ANGLE = 0

[Place all my points here]

LOOP/END



And will all the points be getting unique element names, will I be able to see the second set of points on the CAD-model?

Have a great day everyone! Frog
Parents
  • Thank you for the input! Slight smile

    Ok, here's how this part looks and as you can see the left and right area are the same, and not mirrored.
    If Pattern/Paste with pattern is a better option then I'll do that instead.

    I will be using the A0B0 probe angle through all points (and circles) in these areas.
    There will be no need to use the mirror option so I guess I can place the origin near the corner of the part where REF B intersects with REF C?

    I can live with ID's such as Pnt1[1] and Pnt1[2], as long as I can reach them in evaluations.
    But instead of Pnt1[1] and Pnt1[2], could I have Pnt1[L] and Pnt1[R]?






    Attached Files
Reply
  • Thank you for the input! Slight smile

    Ok, here's how this part looks and as you can see the left and right area are the same, and not mirrored.
    If Pattern/Paste with pattern is a better option then I'll do that instead.

    I will be using the A0B0 probe angle through all points (and circles) in these areas.
    There will be no need to use the mirror option so I guess I can place the origin near the corner of the part where REF B intersects with REF C?

    I can live with ID's such as Pnt1[1] and Pnt1[2], as long as I can reach them in evaluations.
    But instead of Pnt1[1] and Pnt1[2], could I have Pnt1[L] and Pnt1[R]?






    Attached Files
Children
No Data