Trying to create a plane off the stand pins to be able to zero out on it.

 Here is my code. I Have told my vector to be <0,0,1> and both of my planes are the same. But when I run it states my points are our of location. Though it is odd that they are calling out the points as bad when the -5.3 is the distance I put as the spacer for my plane points. 

Which axis is out of stroke? 

You're not telling it where X and Y are located.
Maybe try picking up a circle on the ID/OD of one of the pins and call that your X/Y origin and try it again. Then redefine your DCC plane and see if that works. 

Also are you measuring the pins, then setting the part on top of them?

Yes, I am trying to get a raised zero plane. So, my probe doesn't hit the granite. 

Did setting an X/Y location correct your error?

No,  I wrote more code and now it will run, but it is trying to find the upper left-hand corner, after I take my four manual points. 

I'm probably way off base here but I've had to use standoffs as part of my Z origin at times (like when using the plane as a datum simulator), although typically I'll try to use 2-4-6 blocks if possible so that I can still probe in that area while the part is loaded.  I know that's not always an option.  Anyway, what I've done may be considered crude, but I'll align entirely with the pins at first (plane, 3D line between diameters and the x/y origin at one of the pins), then load the part and do another alignment with the part, still using that plane as the level/z origin.  I used to use calypso and that software has something called "search distance," which is pretty much a separate pre-hit/retract distance from the rest of the program and is often used to locate parts safely when loading the part just by "eyeballing" where it should be.  That said, I've done something similar with PC-DMIS by doing a progressive alignment using a larger pre-hit/retract distance just for the alignment, especially in the case where I'm not entirely sure of the exact location of the standoffs/pins relative to the sides of my part.  Not sure if that offers any insight whatsoever but that's one of many ways to get the job done in a situation like yours.

I'm probably way off base here but I've had to use standoffs as part of my Z origin at times (like when using the plane as a datum simulator), although typically I'll try to use 2-4-6 blocks if possible so that I can still probe in that area while the part is loaded.  I know that's not always an option.  Anyway, what I've done may be considered crude, but I'll align entirely with the pins at first (plane, 3D line between diameters and the x/y origin at one of the pins), then load the part and do another alignment with the part, still using that plane as the level/z origin.  I used to use calypso and that software has something called "search distance," which is pretty much a separate pre-hit/retract distance from the rest of the program and is often used to locate parts safely when loading the part just by "eyeballing" where it should be.  That said, I've done something similar with PC-DMIS by doing a progressive alignment using a larger pre-hit/retract distance just for the alignment, especially in the case where I'm not entirely sure of the exact location of the standoffs/pins relative to the sides of my part.  Not sure if that offers any insight whatsoever but that's one of many ways to get the job done in a situation like yours.

Is the "search distance" parameter from the Calpyso software similar to the "Check" parameter that is in PC-DMIS?

Check distance is the amount it will continue to search before it gives up, right?  If so, no, that's a separate setting in calypso.  Search distance is really just a quick way of changing your pre-hit/retract for finding the part and can be made default for alignments or anything else if desired, sort of like having pre-set strategies in PC-DMIS for certain features.  Also, I haven't used calypso since 2022 so things could've changed since then.