hexagon logo

Workpiece Offset Machine Coordinate vs Manual Alignment

Hey all, 

We've got some bright Machinists here that are tired of having the CMM programmer manual align their parts every few months. We get a few repeat jobs once every 6 months or so, and by that time either probe calibration, machine settling or by some other factor I'm not aware of our programs will need a new manual alignment. Afterwards, we unmark these features and let the job run in DCC mode. (sidenote, my hunch is that the manual alignment feature's measured coordinates are married to the previous probe alignment, so after a new alignment they don't 'match' the expected coordinates for DCC mode)


Anyways here is my question/discussion; What are the pros/cons of using a manual alignment vs a know x,y,z position for part programs?
I don't have a good answer for rebuttal to our machinists, and I'm starting to wonder if some of our programs would be better off with hard-coded workpiece offsets. We use an Erowa chuck with custom fixturing for 70% of our jobs, so these parts are highly repeatable. 

What are your thoughts?

Parents
  • probe calibrations (if done correctly) should not ever effect an alignment, but HOMING the machine will.  HOME is not 'carved in stone', HOME is triggered by the machine passing a mechanical 'thing' on the machine and thus setting XYZ zero.  Since this is never perfect, the XYZ values will slowly drift over time.

Reply
  • probe calibrations (if done correctly) should not ever effect an alignment, but HOMING the machine will.  HOME is not 'carved in stone', HOME is triggered by the machine passing a mechanical 'thing' on the machine and thus setting XYZ zero.  Since this is never perfect, the XYZ values will slowly drift over time.

Children
No Data