Ran program online using fixed rad method, the "code" method I posted below, and using "Relative To" (suggested by Matthew D. Hoedeman ).
All correlated w/in 0.0002.
Will be using the code method I posted below. Thanks all for the help!
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
When I need to measure a small arc, I use the fixed rad & origin method that is detailed in the help file.
Is it frowned upon or less accurate for any reason to do this instead?-->
CIR6 =FEAT/CONTACT/CIRCLE/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN,OUT,FIXED_RAD
THEO/<0.026564,-0.046011,-0.015>,<0,0,1>,0.038157,0
ACTL/<0.02656,-0.046003,-0.015>,<0,0,1>,0.038157,0
TARG/<0.02656,-0.046003,-0.015>,<0,0,1>
START ANG=120,END ANG=60
ANGLE VEC=<0.8660254,0.5,0>
DIRECTION=CW
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=NO
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=NO
CIR7 =FEAT/CONTACT/CIRCLE/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN,OUT,LEAST_SQR
THEO/<CIR6.X,CIR6.Y,CIR6.Z>,<0,0,1>,0.038157,0
ACTL/<0.02656,-0.046003,-0.015>,<0,0,1>,0.038157,0
TARG/<CIR6.X,CIR6.Y,CIR6.Z>,<0,0,1>
START ANG=60,END ANG=120
ANGLE VEC=<0.8660254,0.5,0>
DIRECTION=CCW
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=NO
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=NO
