Evaluating roundness for cylinders (circle subitems). Roundness for first cylinder worked great, no quirks or hiccups.
Second cylinder evaluated fine too, but the subitems were wrongly named (for some reason it used the default naming scheme):
Went to create an alignment using this cylinder and the alignment dialog displayed the correct naming scheme for the subitems:
That was odd, so I set off to repeat the roundness evaluation, just to find when expanding the feature, the subitem naming were correct:
...but when trying to create the evaluation, I get the following error message:
"Feature CYLHÖ75 and it's subitems are not synchronized. Re-execute them to synchronize them again."
I'm not sure. The synchronisation error is usually seen if a feature has been partially executed but then stopped before it's complete - only executing one level of a multi-level cylinder for example - could that have been the case here?
Nope, fully executed. Also, I am not doing any measurements at all during this. It is like the feature is "lagging" behind.
It starts with getting the subitem names wrong with "CIR1" instead of "Circle ". (pic1)
I though it would correct itself at next execution, so I kept programming.
Noticed that when doing an alignment on this cylinder, the subitem names in the alignment dialog was not "CIR1" anymore, but correct with "Circle". (pic2)
Seems it now had caught up with changing the subitem names to "Circle" instead of "CIR".
Tried with a new roundness evaluation and the subitem names were correct. (pic3)
However, trying to actually create the evaluation, I get the synchronization error (pic4)
Could it still be "lagging" at this point and not "caught up" to the feature?
vpt.se Can you please send me the routine showing this behaviour? Also, are you able to reproduce the behaviour by following a certain sequence of steps or did it happen just this once?
Here's the link to upload your routine:
https://sendit.hexagon.com/filedrop/~5diqk0 I'm not sure how much help it will be if it only happened once and you are unable to repeat, but we will take a look.